The current "end to end" principle is being challenged by telecoms who want to control the networks and arguably access to which services get to use what resources. A lot of people were alarmed by Business Week's interview with the CEO of SBC - "Why should they be allowed to use my pipes" Ed Whitaker - glibly outlined his plan for global domination. In Newsweek he elaborated about more actions he would take to wrest power over the networks. But wasn't SBC, at one time, dependent on the graces of the same regulations they now want to smother? On the other side of the issue, Doc Searls discusses the tussle over whether the networks should be "owned", "controlled" or "managed", along with his take on the rhetoric that different sides of the Internet privatization issue use, in this interesting essay.
Shooting Holes in the Manifesto
By a.r.e. on November 22, 2005 11:36 AM
© 2004-2011 Acronymrequired.com
© 2004-2011 Acronymrequired.com
Categories:
November 2011
Search
Categories
- Basic Research
- Biotechnology
- Briefly
- Business and Technology
- Economics
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Hardly Science
- Higher Education
- Medicine
- Pharmaceutical Interests, Public Interests
- Politics, but No Science
- Project/Process Management
- Public Health
- Public Policy
- Recycling The News
- Science and Development
- Science and Law
- Science and Media
- Surely You're Joking
- What We're Reading, Watching
